J.P. Morgan abandoned its bearish Tesla (TSLA) price target that had implied a 65% drop in the stock, as a new analyst took the reins of coverage with a notably less pessimistic view of the electric-vehicle maker.

The coverage change removes one of Wall Street’s most prominent bear cases on TSLA, a shift that deal-focused investors may read as a near-term sentiment catalyst for a stock already trading near $418 with a $1.57 trillion market capitalisation.1

Key Takeaways

  • J.P. Morgan’s Tesla bear call, predicting a 65% decline, is dropped.
  • A new analyst has assumed coverage with a less negative stance.
  • TSLA trades near $418, roughly 421% above Morningstar’s fair-value estimate.

The Coverage Shift in Context

Tesla shares were changing hands at approximately $418 as of June 4, 2026, putting the stock up sharply from its 52-week low of $273.21 and well below its 52-week high of $498.83.2 By comparison, the broader auto-manufacturing peer group – including Toyota (TM), General Motors (GM) and Ford (F) – carries market caps ranging from roughly $63 billion to $235 billion, underscoring how far Tesla’s $1.57 trillion valuation diverges from traditional auto multiples.

J.P. Morgan had been among the most vocal bears on the stock, with a price target that implied a decline of roughly 65% from prevailing levels. That call is now formally retired following a change in analyst coverage at the bank.1

Detailed Analysis

The incoming J.P. Morgan analyst holds a less gloomy view of Tesla and Elon Musk’s broader technology ambitions for the company, according to reports from MarketWatch.1 While a specific new price target or rating was not immediately disclosed in available sources, the directional shift alone carries weight given J.P. Morgan’s profile as one of the largest institutional research operations on Wall Street.

Tesla’s valuation remains a polarising topic across the Street. Morningstar pegs Tesla’s fair value at $168 per share – implying the stock trades at a 421% premium – while flagging “very high” uncertainty around that estimate.2 The gap between bear-case fundamental targets and the stock’s actual price reflects an ongoing debate about whether Tesla should be valued as an automaker, an artificial-intelligence platform, or a diversified energy-and-robotics company.

Recent operational catalysts have provided fresh ammunition for bulls. Tesla received approval to begin testing its Full Self-Driving software in the Flanders region of Belgium, adding to prior greenlit markets in Europe.2 The company also announced a rollout of FSD technology in China in May 2026, and reported strong European monthly sales growth – developments that shift the conversation away from near-term vehicle delivery headwinds.2

Valuation & Analyst Landscape

Tesla’s normalised price-to-earnings ratio stands at approximately 223, versus 36.8 for Alphabet (GOOGL) – one metric illustrating the premium the market assigns to Tesla’s non-automotive growth optionality.2 The company’s price-to-sales ratio of 15.3 and price-to-cash-flow of 100 similarly stand well above those of direct EV rival Rivian (RIVN), which trades at a price-to-sales of roughly 4.2

The bearish camp has long argued that increasing competition from traditional automakers and Chinese EV manufacturers will erode Tesla’s margins and force further price cuts. Bulls counter that Tesla’s autonomous-driving technology, energy storage business, and humanoid-robotics pipeline justify a valuation framework that extends beyond cars.

Outlook

With J.P. Morgan’s deep-discount target now off the table, near-term price-action traders will watch for the bank’s replacement rating and target, which could serve as a fresh directional signal. MarketWatch summarised the shift bluntly, noting that “a new analyst has taken over the bank’s Tesla coverage, and he has a less gloomy view of Elon Musk’s EV company.”1

For retail investors tracking valuation catalysts, the J.P. Morgan move is a reminder that analyst transitions can materially reset a stock’s perceived institutional sentiment – independent of any change in the underlying business. Whether the new coverage stance translates into an outright upgrade remains to be seen.

Conclusion

J.P. Morgan’s exit from one of Wall Street’s most bearish Tesla positions closes a chapter that had hung over TSLA’s sentiment profile for months. With the stock already trading near 2.5 times its 52-week low, the removal of a high-profile 65% downside call adds incremental tailwind to a name where the bull-versus-bear debate remains as heated as ever.

Not investment advice. For informational purposes only.

References

1MarketWatch (June 5, 2026). “J.P. Morgan ends bearish Tesla call that was predicting a 65% stock drop”. MarketWatch via Facebook. Retrieved June 5, 2026.

2(June 4, 2026). “Tesla Inc (TSLA) Stock Price Quote, Value & News”. Morningstar. Retrieved June 5, 2026.

3MarketWatch (June 5, 2026). “Bearish call on Tesla abandoned by J.P. Morgan”. X (formerly Twitter). Retrieved June 5, 2026.

4(June 5, 2026). “J.P. Morgan ends bearish Tesla call that was predicting a 65% stock drop”. Moomoo. Retrieved June 5, 2026.

5J.P. Morgan Wealth Management (2026). “Mid-Year Outlook 2026: Promise and Pressure”. J.P. Morgan. Retrieved June 5, 2026.